lundi 2 février 2015

Hollister Mont In comparison

swimming pool lands Zuma in hot water Johannesburg South Africa's top official anti graft watchdog is recommending President Jacob Zuma repay some of some sort of $21 million publicly funded "security upgrade" for you to his private home, which included a swimming pool and tent area, a newspaper claimed on Friday. The Postal mail and Guardian weekly mentioned Hollister Mont the Public Protector's provisional report, entitled 'Opulence over a Grand Scale', found Zuma had taken from "substantial" personal gain from the home improvements paid for by the state. Zuma's spokesman declined to comment on the actual newspaper report. No one seemed to be immediately available to comment with the office of Public Guard Thuli Madonsela. The leaked findings of an investigation by the official zero corruption watchdog into Zuma's Nkandla residence could be damaging to Peuterey Turkey Zuma as well as the ruling African National The nation's lawmakers (ANC) six months before an election. The newspaper said this improvements made to Zuma's home integrated a visitors' lounge, amphitheatre, cows enclosure and swimming pool, called in Public Works documents to be a 'fire pool' on the pretext it could ambigu up as a water tank for fire fighting uses. The government went to court this kind of month to try to prevent Madonsela through releasing the investigation report, on the grounds that cabinet ministers needed added time to work out whether its findings jeopardised Zuma's security. It quickly dropped its challenge after Madonsela insisted she had gone to great lengths so your report did not pose any threat. The Mail as well as Guardian said Madonsela's report charged Zuma of violating two exec ethics codes failing to defend state resources and mistaken parliament. Zuma, a polygamous Zulu traditionalist whose first 5 years in office have been littered with scams, told parliament last year all the complexes in the sprawling compound in rural KwaZulu Natal province had been developed "by ourselves as family, and never by the government". The report also found some of the more reputable security features, such as 20 residences for police protection, a new clinic and two helipads, were excessive and should have been placed in a nearby town to benefit the bigger community, the paper mentioned. The paper estimated several of the questionable features of the improve at 20 million rand ($2 , 000, 000). It also said that Zuma ordered his private architect be picked in as "principal agent" to oversee this upgrade, even though he was not Cheap Tiffany And Co Uk a security expert. In comparison, your 215 million rand spent on Zuma's house is in stark contrast to show money spent on improving the basic safety of previous South Cameras presidents, the Mail and Parent said. FW de Klerk, South Africa's very last white president who left office in 1994, been given 236,000 rand for upgrades in order to his house, while 32 million rand was spent on Nelson Mandela's house. ($1 = Hollister Ek?i 10.2228 South Africa rand) http://ift.tt/1DrlI1A http://ift.tt/1mNUYSn http://ift.tt/1tZmB1G http://ift.tt/1tZmB1I http://ift.tt/1mNUYSn





Hollister Mont In comparison

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire